Some of these political challenges included reflections on Feminism, such as those led by Linda Zerilli and Fina Birulés, with commentaries provided by Marta Segarra and Lorena Fuster. Zerilli stressed the importance of recognizing multiple temporalities in the history of feminist struggle, shifting our focus from its narration as a historical process, its periodization (and its underlying notion of progress) to action; this approach embraces imagination and requires conceptual innovation. Birulés emphasized the challenge we face when investigating female philosophers trying not to homogenize them. To achieve this task is important to equip ourselves with methodological resources to provide some order beyond mere periodization, such as the concept of "hidden tradition" which serves as a heuristic resource. Thinking with Arendt, Birulés referred to the centrality of freedom, action, mutual promises, and alliances among women not rooted in shared oppression, but rather maintaining the possibility of singularizing ourselves, distinguishing ourselves. Fuster enriched these ideas asserting that the transmission of women philosophers’ thought from the past constitutes a political commitment undertaken by those in the present. In alignment with Zerilli and Birulés, Fuster highlighted the need to conceive a history of feminism centered on freedom rather than equality, knowing that complexity and plurality are not a problem to be solved, but rather an opportunity for imagination and for weaving together diverse interdisciplinary sources that contribute to comprehension. Segarra pointed out that this history to be traced is not an archeological seeking to locate an origin, but a history traced from the present, with and against the archive, recognizing that any heritage is always heterogeneous, and its unity only comes from our reception in the present.